<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stratton Law Firm - Wisdom &#38; Information &#187; Estates, Wills &amp; Trusts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.strattonlaw.com/category/wills-trusts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.strattonlaw.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:25:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fairness in Distributions &#8211; Defusing Emotional Timebombs</title>
		<link>http://www.strattonlaw.com/wills-trusts/fairness-in-distributions-defusing-emotional-timebombs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.strattonlaw.com/wills-trusts/fairness-in-distributions-defusing-emotional-timebombs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 22:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stratton Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estates, Wills & Trusts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strattonlaw.com/?p=599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When is a Dollar not equal to a Dollar? For those who have dealt with estate or trust distributions, it is found in the difference in the theoretical value and the true value received in distributions.  Would you prefer $1,000 in cash or $1,000 in the present value of a US Savings Bond?  Both are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.strattonlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/1B4084.lowres.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-604" title="1B4084.lowres" src="http://www.strattonlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/1B4084.lowres-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>When is a Dollar not equal to a Dollar? For those who have dealt with estate or trust distributions, it is found in the difference in the <em>theoretical</em> value and the<em> true</em> value received in distributions.  Would you prefer $1,000 in cash or $1,000 in the present value of a US Savings Bond?  Both are worth $1,000, but the US Savings Bond has &#8220;built-in&#8221; accumulated <em>taxable</em> interest.  Knowing that you will have to pay income tax on the accumulated interest, are the values the same? </span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"> </span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"> </span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">Should each beneficiary receive exactly the same in value, or is adjustment in value warranted in some cases? For example, it is said that the law favors a distribution &#8220;in kind.&#8221; Suppose there are exactly equal amounts of cash and &#8220;blue-chip&#8221; stocks. Also imagine that two beneficiaries are to divide the assets equally. One decides to take cash, the other the stocks. Is this the equivalent? Arguably, the recipient of stock must sell, pay a transaction fee (commission) before having cash in hand. Leaving out the market fluctuations, that transaction fee will be due <em>someday</em>, and an appropriate adjustment should be made now to truly equalize the distribution.</span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"> </span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">Real estate and appraisal issues are a bit more complex, but essentially the same sort of issue. Real estate appraisals are made by the compilation of sales amounts for similar properties, then extrapolated to apply to the subject property. The reported sales figures are the <em>gross sales price</em>, not the net after sales agent/broker commissions. The appraisals therefore inherently overstate the &#8220;true value&#8221; to the estate. If a particular beneficiary wants a particular piece of real property instead of cash, is the appraisal amount appropriate for distribution purposes? Generally no, because in like fashion to the stock, the beneficiary would have to sell, pay a commission at closing, and only then receive cash of a lesser amount. If the property is to be distributed, not sold, it should be counted at a lesser amount.</span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"> </span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">For example, assume the entire estate consists of cash of $400,000, and a parcel of real estate appraised at $100,000, all to be equally split between &#8220;A&#8221; and &#8220;B&#8221;. Beneficiary &#8220;A&#8221; wants cash, and &#8220;B&#8221; wants the parcel plus cash. In this hypothetical, assume it is well known that the typical commission in this community for a parcel of this type is 10%. The estate would then receive a net amount of $90,000 after paying a 10% commission, not the appraised amount of $100,000. The total estate value for distribution is reduced to $490,000 rather than $500,000; one-half each beneficiary is $245,000. &#8220;A&#8221; should receive $245,000 in cash; &#8220;B&#8221; should receive the parcel valued at $90,000 <em>for distribution</em> purposes, and $155,000 in cash.</span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"> </span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">Automobiles are another source of stress and potentially unfair distribution. Valuation of used vehicle run the gamut, from wholesale to retail, form poor to excellent condition. Classifying a vehicle as having a distribution value at the retail pricing is abusive, although the wholesale is often too low; something in between is fair. An expert can review the condition to alleviate disagreements. It is best to reach an understanding as to value for distribution by all to avoid family discord.</span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">It is often optional under law to consider these issues in asset distribution, but if they are taken into account, a fair distribution occurs. Fairness goes a long way to family harmony, or at least a long way toward avoiding <strong>dis</strong>harmony.</span></span></div>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"> </p>
<p></span> </p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strattonlaw.com/wills-trusts/fairness-in-distributions-defusing-emotional-timebombs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Estate Tax Regime</title>
		<link>http://www.strattonlaw.com/wills-trusts/the-new-estate-tax-regime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.strattonlaw.com/wills-trusts/the-new-estate-tax-regime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 19:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stratton Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estates, Wills & Trusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Matters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strattonlaw.com/?p=527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First we predicted that the Congress would not fail to amend the expiring estate tax provisions; then 2010 arrived and the sunset of the 2001 &#8211; 2009 tax law came with nothing having been done. The elections of 2010 seemed to place the House and Senate on opposite sides of the issue, with President Obama [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">First we predicted that the Congress would not fail to amend the expiring estate tax provisions; then 2010 arrived and the sunset of the 2001 &#8211; 2009 tax law came with nothing having been done. The elections of 2010 seemed to place the House and Senate on opposite sides of the issue, with President Obama insisting the rich be required to give up half their assets. We predicted a deadlock on the extension of the &#8220;Bush tax cuts,&#8221; and nothing would be done. Wrong again.</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">Now, if you are single and have a net worth <em>including death benefits from personally owned life insurance, group life and retirement plans of ALL types</em> of over $5 million, then you are subject to estate tax. The rate is 35% of the excess. NOTE: your proper administrative costs are also deductible, so if you are just over, your estate isn’t likely to suffer the tax.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">If you are married, your tax situation improves if you are leaving assets to your spouse. There is no tax on assets left to a spouse &#8211; or those provided as gifts to a spouse during lifetime. If a well considered trust is created, a married person can create benefits for a surviving spouse and children, and exempt a total of $10 million &#8211; $5 million for each spouse.</p>
<p>Estimates are that less than 1% of residents to whom this law applies will actually be taxable. The gift and estate tax combined has never raised over 6% of the Federal Budget. It has remained conceptually one of the more irritating taxes ever imposed, even for those whom it does not affect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strattonlaw.com/wills-trusts/the-new-estate-tax-regime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Money</title>
		<link>http://www.strattonlaw.com/wills-trusts/free-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.strattonlaw.com/wills-trusts/free-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stratton Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estates, Wills & Trusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Matters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strattonlaw.com/?p=523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The answer to &#8220;Why an ILIT?&#8221; If you have a taxable estate, then an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust creates free money. Really. OK, so your estate is going to be taxable. You get it. Your family will be paying out a chunk. In order to be prepared for that reality, you can choose to keep [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">The answer to &#8220;Why an ILIT?&#8221; <em>If you have a taxable estate</em>, then an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust creates free money. Really.</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OK, so your estate is going to be taxable. You get it. Your family will be paying out a chunk. In order to be prepared for that reality, you can choose to keep that chunk in cash or near cash assets &#8211; which we all know gives pretty poor returns AND isn’t always possible to do. Just to be realisitic, you may have mortgages or lines of credit that will be called due at death. Read your promissory note sometime; death is usually a basis for the lender to demand full payment. Or they could just &#8220;deem themselves insecure.&#8221; Had a bad day? Feel a little insecure? Call in some loans!!</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Wouldn’t it be nice if you could buy that money at the very time it is needed at a discount? You are right, that is life insurance. Pay a little each year over your lifetime and a lot is paid out where you want it at your death. Sorry, not a lot of fun for you, but boy, it will care for the people <span style="text-decoration: underline;">you</span> care for! Great. Buy life insurance and it increases your estate tax! About one-third to one half of the added insurance will go to taxes &#8211; - &#8211; unless you create an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust to buy and own the insurance. If you do that, the money needed will be there without estate tax. The amount saved is truly free!</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">How does it work? You &#8211; called the &#8220;Settlor&#8221; or &#8220;Grantor&#8221; &#8211; create a special type of trust called an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust, or ILIT for short. It may be just labeled as an Irrevocable Trust, but have extra language that facilitates the ownership, management and use of the life insurance death benefit to coordinate with your estate. If so, it is an ILIT, a carefully designed trust for a very specific purpose. In the ILIT you name someone other than yourself as Trustee. Usually the Trustee is a professional or institutional trustee, because it is important enough to use professionals, a little complex, and a bit of a burden to family and friends. The professionals will cost something, probably $2,000 to $5,000 annually, depending on a number of factors.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">You as the Settlor make a contribution to the trust. In the Trust, you have named certain persons to be &#8220;present interest&#8221; beneficiaries, with a right to receive a pro-rata share of any contribution. They are entitled to receive notice of the contribution, and may exercise their withdrawal right for up to thirty days following receipt of the notice. Currently the annual gift exemption is $13,000 per donor, and per donee. Married persons may join with each other to make gifts. So if there are three &#8220;present interest&#8221; beneficiaries named in the trust, and spouses join together to make the contribution to the Trust, the maximum amount which can be treated as annual exempt gifts is:</p>
<address>2 x $13,000 = $26,000 combined gift</address>
<address>3 x $26,000 = $78,000 with 3 beneficiaries</address>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Trustee says: &#8220;Settlor, I have the money you contributed, and the notices to the present interest beneficiaries have come back with all of them waiving their withdrawal rights. I would like to buy life insurance on your life, and have arranged with this fine representative to do that.&#8221; The life insurance is owned by the trustee on behalf of the Trust, and is NOT part of your estate. If you transfer existing life insurance to an ILIT, the Internal Revenue Code treats it as taxable in your estate if you die in three years or less.</p>
<p>Now what? You continue to make contributions to the Trust. Contributing more than is needed for the insurance premium is wise, and the Trustee will invest it, probably in cash accounts until there is enough to do something else. Variable Life Insurance would allow most of the extra contribution to be invested within the life insurance, into the various investment funds available.</p>
<p>The best part is there is more &#8220;FREE MONEY.&#8221; Investment yield &#8220;inside&#8221; a life insurance policy is not income taxable until a policy is <em>surrendered</em>. That’s right, not even at death! The proceeds of the death benefit are both income and estate tax free in the ILIT. The ILIT is both authorized and directed to use the proceeds to loan to your estate, or buy assets from it. Your estate (or living trust) then has the cash it needs to pay loans and estate taxes. The assets now held by the ILIT are used for the benefit of your beneficiaries &#8211; and note &#8211; the &#8220;present interest&#8221; beneficiaries may not all be the ultimate beneficiaries!</p>
<p>ILITs are therefore &#8220;free money,&#8221; and one of our favorite tools to preserve families and their assets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strattonlaw.com/wills-trusts/free-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OLMSTEAD Revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.strattonlaw.com/business/florida-supreme-court-gaffe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.strattonlaw.com/business/florida-supreme-court-gaffe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stratton Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asset Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estates, Wills & Trusts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strattonlaw.com/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LLCs are often used for businesses because they offer dual protection: Limited liability of owners and managers for entity level acts; Limited ability to &#8220;take&#8221; an ownership interest away to collect for an outside personal liability. Single member LLCs (just one owner) were determined to be unprotected in the decision of the Florida Supreme Court in Olmstead [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.strattonlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/Courts-Bldg2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-457" title="columns of justice" src="http://www.strattonlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/Courts-Bldg2-206x300.jpg" alt="" width="206" height="300" /></a>LLCs are often used for businesses because they offer dual protection:</p>
<ol style="text-align: justify;">
<li>Limited liability of owners and managers for entity level acts;</li>
<li>Limited ability to &#8220;take&#8221; an ownership interest away to collect for an outside personal liability.</li>
</ol>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Single member</span> LLCs (just one owner) were determined to be unprotected in the decision of the Florida Supreme Court in <em>Olmstead v. Federal Trade Commission, SC08?1009 (June 24, 2010) </em><a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/fl-supreme-court/1528945.html"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #0000ff;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #0000ff; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #0000ff;">http://caselaw.findlaw.com/fl-supreme-court/1528945.html</span></span></span></span></a>.  That decision reached beyond the question asked by the 11th Federal Circuit Court of Appeals to frame a solution which effectively recast interests in LLC to have the same legal attributes as stock in corporations. That means that such interests are legally freely transferable, and capable of seizure and sale in judicial process.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Florida Bar has sought a middle ground in negotiation with the banking lobby to protect multi-member LLCs.  Legislation is expected to be signed by Governor Scott shortly.  However many of us are not convinced that the legislation cures the patient&#8217;s ills, and firmly believe that this is a palliative at best.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">LLCs have been the most popular form of business today due to their supposed dual protection attributes of protecting individual owners as to operational liability, and limiting third party collection.  We have devised alternative planning for our clients, and will continue to seek to improve protective plans and choices.  LLCs have been a very capable tool in estate planning as well as business, allowing the grouping of assets, structuring buy-sell agreements, providing for active business continuity, and for post-death control by the best equipped person. </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Regretably, the influence of the large banking lobby on this legislative &#8220;fix&#8221; (and the level of campaign contributions made by banking interests) has damaged the reputation of Florida in the business and estate planning arena beyond that which favorable weather will offset.  There are other place to live or move your business to.  We already have seen the movement away from our state, and expect more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strattonlaw.com/business/florida-supreme-court-gaffe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Child is Grown</title>
		<link>http://www.strattonlaw.com/wills-trusts/295/</link>
		<comments>http://www.strattonlaw.com/wills-trusts/295/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stratton Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estates, Wills & Trusts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strattonlaw.com/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a few years ago they were your bundles of joy, then your sleepless nights, your evenings and weekends with sports; you were the tutor, they the students.  Now they are going to college.  My, how things change!  And they have changed probably more than you realize. In Florida as in most states, age eighteen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.strattonlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/graduate.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-484" title="graduation day" src="http://www.strattonlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/graduate-300x227.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="227" /></a>Just a few years ago they were your bundles of joy, then your sleepless nights, your evenings and weekends with sports; you were the tutor, they the students.  Now they are going to college.  My, how things change!  And they have changed probably more than you realize.</p>
<p>In Florida as in most states, age eighteen is the age of majority.  Your progeny can contract, marry, vote, join the military, cannot drink until 21, but do have privacy rights.  Yes, even from you.  Their University, School or College cannot provide any privacy protected information to you, including health, grades, class attendance or anything else.  A call in the night to inform you that your child has been injured (you were on the Emergency Notification), followed by the statement that they cannot disclose anything more, is seriously distressing.  It is even more distressing if that educational institution is a long distance away.  So what can you do?</p>
<p> Now, before the migration back to higher learning takes place, consider that if your child executes a Durable Power of Attorney, Health Care Designation (called a Health Care Power of Attorney, Authority or Surrogacy &#8211; all mean the same), and Living Will, these concerns are generally resolved, because you will have the authority to be informed, and to act on your child&#8217;s behalf.  You could add a Will to the list, although that is more of an education in responsibility than a necessity.  Most states provide that the parents are default beneficiaries, and few college age children have much in the way of assets.</p>
<p> Your family or estate planning attorney can quickly prepare these documents; the young generally have simple issues.  Call, but be prepared to provide the responses as to who will be named with authority under each document.  Probably that will be you as parents, and possibly an older brother or sister, or another relative as a backup in case you aren&#8217;t available.  Remember that it is your child&#8217;s choice, not yours.  Of course, they may prefer going to college than being out on the street, so you do have <em>some</em> influence.  Once executed, the documents are usually scanned to PDF files, and can be sent to the institution when needed.  The cost to prepare these documents is much less than a plane ticket or lost workday, traveling with the fear that your child needs you.</p>
<p>You may wish to consider our posting at <span id="sample-permalink"><a href="http://www.strattonlaw.com/archives/214"><span style="color: #008080;">http://www.strattonlaw.com/archives/214</span></a> for further thoughts.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strattonlaw.com/wills-trusts/295/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Estate Planning Minimum Standards</title>
		<link>http://www.strattonlaw.com/wills-trusts/estate-planning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.strattonlaw.com/wills-trusts/estate-planning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stratton Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estates, Wills & Trusts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strattonlaw.com/?p=214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opinions vary on the &#8220;Standard of Care&#8221; for an estate plan.  To a great degree, it depends upon the size and nature of assets, family circumstances, and a really good crystal ball in which to see the future.  What is the minimum needed documents for the hypothetical &#8220;average&#8221; Jack or Jill &#8211; or possibly Jack [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.strattonlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/flames.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-516" title="wild fire" src="http://www.strattonlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/flames-199x300.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="300" /></a>Opinions vary on the &#8220;Standard of Care&#8221; for an estate plan.  To a great degree, it depends upon the size and nature of assets, family circumstances, and a really good crystal ball in which to see the future.  <span id="more-214"></span>What is the minimum needed documents for the hypothetical &#8220;average&#8221; Jack or Jill &#8211; or possibly Jack and Jill and the three minor J&#8217;s?</p>
<p>If you have no family, friends or favorite charities, AND you have little or no assets and don&#8217;t expect to have this change anytime soon, skip this and read something else.  If you have <em>some</em> assets  and people (or a charity, school or similar institution) you care about, then here are our thoughts:</p>
<ol>
<li>A Will, and if you have minor children, guardians are named, and maybe a &#8220;standby trust&#8221; to manage assets for the children;</li>
<li>Durable Power of Attorney</li>
<li>Health Care Power of Attorney or Surrogacy</li>
<li>Living Will</li>
<li>In our office, we also add an Authority to Dispose of Remains &#8211; for the choices of burial, cremation, and other directions.  These choices are some of the most difficult for the survivors.</li>
</ol>
<p>If your assets are sufficient, you may wish to create one or more trusts during your lifetime.  If you have any significant life insurance, possibly one of these trusts would be to hold your life insurance to keep it out of you estate for Federal Estate Tax purposes.  For larger levels of assets, it is often very useful to interpose an entity or entities to hold logical sets of assets for management and liability protection, and to have those entities owned by one or more of the trusts you have created.  There are additional, specialized techniques which provide tax incentives and retirement structures, but the main list is above.</p>
<p>The process may be simple and direct, or quite elaborate and extend over time.  The purposes served are for management, tax efficiency, liability protection, convenience and control as to beneficiaries, and for expedited transfer of authority upon death.  Indirectly, this process creates structure and organization leading to financial efficiencies.  In all instances, the core documents are the same, and the enhanced planning has specific and determinable benefits and purposes.</p>
<p>If you are single and sharing your life with a &#8220;significant other,&#8221; you MUST state your wishes in writing, or else.  The law will not protect your unwritten informal declarations.  You may wish to look at our article, &#8220;Living Together&#8221; at <a href="http://www.strattonlaw.com/archives/5"><span id="sample-permalink"><span style="color: #0000ff;">http://www.strattonlaw.com/archives/5</span></span> </a>in this Web Site. </p>
<p>Children who have recently become age 18 have special problems.  We refer you to the our article, at <span id="sample-permalink"><a href="http://www.strattonlaw.com/archives/295"><span style="color: #0000ff;">http://www.strattonlaw.com/archives/295</span></a> entitled &#8220;It was a Very Good Year&#8221;.  Remember that these, your children now have independence under law, and privacy rights.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strattonlaw.com/wills-trusts/estate-planning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

